Department of Dentistry, Moti Lal Nehru Medical College, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India. E-mail: anandkmr901@gmail.com
Submitted: 07-Jan-2023
Accepted in Revised Form: 13-Nov-2023
Published: 03-Apr-2024
DOI: 10.4103/sidj.sidj_9_23
Saint Int Dent J 2023;7:33.
Copyright: © 2024 The Saint's International Dental Journal
Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and has now been officially transferred to Society of Dental Research & Education due to a change in publishing entity.
Repairing traumatic craniofacial fractures is one of the most complex and challenging reconstructive procedures, with several theories regarding its repair prevalent in the literature. The primary goal of management, including diagnostic evaluation, treatment options, and common complications, is to restore the occlusal relationship at the beginning of the sequential repair process so that other structures can come into alignment.
The AO group has proposed a system to classify craniomaxillofacial fractures in adults called AOCMF. This system uses anatomic modules arranged in a hierarchy of three levels of precision to describe the injuries in terms of complexity and details. Level 1 is the most basic and only indicates whether fractures are present in four anatomical units: mandible, midface, skull base, and cranial vault. Level 2 provides more detailed information about the location of the fractures within specific regions of the mandible, central and lateral midface, internal orbit, endocranial and exocranial skull base, and cranial vault. Level 3 describes even greater detail about the location of the injury, focusing on morphology, fragmentation, displacement, and bone defects, within specific subregions.[1] Although the AO classification is not yet widely adopted, it is a promising research tool for future.
Artificial intelligence (AI), a platform released by ChatGPT in November 30, 2022, is transforming numerous industries and research fields, including oral and maxillofacial surgery. In the realm of craniofacial surgery, AI has been instrumental in advancing the accuracy and speed of diagnosis and treatment plans, facilitating research, and improving patient outcomes. AI has been playing a significant role in advancing the research in the field of craniofacial surgery, leading to better patient outcomes. However, it is important to note that AI is a tool and should not replace the expertise and experience of oral and maxillofacial surgeons. The role of AI in oral and maxillofacial surgery should be to enhance and support the work of maxillofacial surgeons, not replace it.
Nil.
There are no conflicts of interest.
1. Cornelius CP, Kunz C, Neff A, Kellman RM, Prein J, AudigéL. The comprehensive AOCMF classification system:Fracture case collection, diagnostic imaging work up, AOCOIAC iconography and coding. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2014;7:S131-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]