Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. E-mail: dhanulb@dental.pdn.ac.lk
Submitted: 10-Dec-2020,
Accepted in Revised Form: 10-Feb-2021,
Published: 18-Jun-2021
DOI: 10.4103/sidj.sidj_52_20
Saint Int Dent J 2021;5:1-2.
Copyright: © 2021 The Saint's International Dental Journal
Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and has now been officially transferred to Society of Dental Research & Education due to a change in publishing entity.
It is no longer uncommon for a patient to use systemic antibiotics independently without an expert advice to overcome periodontal infections. Owing to the misconception of the same microbiological etiology seen in similar periodontal diseases, this self-use of antibiotics is encouraged in patients suffering from periodontal infections. Still, after knowing the current facts and pathologies of a patient with periodontal disease, the reality may differ. The large diversity and the complex interactions within the plaque biofilms challenge the therapeutic concepts that target only a chemical agent’s antimicrobial activity. Every medical practitioner worldwide is now concerned about antibiotics being used by humans. They also believe that the overuse of these systemic drugs contributes to the increasing number of antibacterial infections that are making antibacterial drugs resistant.
Systemic antibiotics indeed can reach most of the oral surfaces and fluids, in addition to having the potential to reach the tissue invaded periodontal pathogens such as Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans.[1] However, an established biofilm can best be removed by a mechanical disruption, which can be achieved by debriding the site through scaling and root surface instrumentation procedures.[2] Further, mechanical debridement has been shown to shift the oral microbiota from a disease profile to a health-related profile that has not proven to be achieved using antibiotics.[3]
Systemic antibiotics have been usually indicated as an adjunct to periodontal debridement in:[4]
Necrotizing periodontal diseases
Acute periodontal infections associated with risk of spread of infection
Severe progressive periodontitis
Immunocompromised patients, e.g. poor glycemic control or other immunocompromised conditions.
Although treatment of aggressive periodontitis indicated for adjunctive systemic antibiotics, the latest findings of less distinct differences in the subgingival microbiota or the host response mechanisms have weakened the basis for such indication. Moreover, systemic antibiotics have not shown any significant difference in outcome between aggressive and chronic periodontitis patients.[4]
Most of the currently available evidence that has evaluated systemic antibiotics benefits is based on Stages III and IV periodontitis with Grade B and C progression rates. It is also worth noting that the periodontal treatment protocols would vary according to severity, complexity, risk of disease progression, and patient-level risk factors. Moreover, different regimens and a wide range of systemic antibiotics have shown diverse effectiveness. Therefore, the general application of the available evidence may not apply to all the presentations. Furthermore, it may be possible that the statistically significant outcomes shown in studies may not directly reflect the clinical significance. The combination of amoxicillin and metronidazole (MET) has shown more significant pocket-depth reduction, a higher percentage of pocket closure, clinical attachment gain, and reduced sites with bleeding on probing. In contrast, MET and azithromycin have shown some improvement to a lesser extent. Despite the type of drug, more adverse effects also have been reported in these study groups.[4]
1. Kim YC, Ko Y, Hong SD, Kim KY, Lee YH, Chae C, et al. Presence of Porphyromonas gingivalis and plasma cell dominance in gingival tissues with periodontitis. Oral Dis 2010;16:375-81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
2. Cobb CM. Clinical significance of non-surgical periodontal therapy:An evidence-based perspective of scaling and root planing. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29 Suppl 2:6-16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
3. Dilber E, Hagenfeld D, EhmkeB, Faggion CM Jr. Asystematic review on bacterial community changes after periodontal therapy with and without systemic antibiotics:An analysis with a wider lens. J Periodontal Res 2020;55:785-800. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Teughels W, Feres M, Oud V, Martín C, Matesanz P, Herrera D. Adjunctive effect of systemic antimicrobials in periodontitis therapy:A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2020;47 Suppl 22:257-81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Wordley V, Shah S, Thompson W. Increased antibiotics use. Br Dent J 2020;229:266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]